Understanding the Difference Between Indirect & Direct Heat Could Save Your Bottom Line and Your Building
Direct Heater: Low Upfront Cost, Lots of Problems Down the Road
A typical million btu fired direct heater, for example, creates about 45 lbs. of water every hour. That is the same thing as someone dumping a 5-gallon bucket of water in your building every hour. This is why, when you add direct fired heat as a temporary climate solution in a space, your windows sweat and your ceiling drips. With a direct heater, an exposed flame has air blown through it and directly to where it needs to go. Direct heat is dangerous for humans, and allows too much moisture to be added to the environment.
Not only is direct heat dangerous for employees, and a problem for the building itself, it’s also more expensive than an indirect heater to operate. For example, a business may purchase a 4 MBTUh direct heater for a very low upfront cost. However, only a fraction of the btus would be needed if they recirculated the heat. The low upfront cost is deceptive.
Indirect Heater: A Better, More Cost-Effective Solution
A better option for a temporary climate solution? An indirect heater featuring an enclosed flame.
Indirect heat doesn't have the same problems as direct heat, because the air is processed before it comes into the space. An indirect heater uses dry and clean air from outside, instead of dirty wet air. Indirect is significantly more expensive in the beginning, but safer and less costly in the long run.
The differences in the two types of heaters are crucial for a site manager to examine. Polygon only offers indirect heating, because we care about our customers and want them to have the best heating solution available.
Polygon is putting engineered fit-for-purpose equipment on our customers’ sites for fewer call backs and enhanced performance to keep projects on schedule! Polygon offers a complete range of services within the areas of temporary climate solutions, document recovery, and emergency drying solutions.